Skip to main content
Journal Article

The power, accuracy, and precision of the Relational Event Model

Organizational Research Methods 24 (4): 802–829
Aaron Schecter, Eric Quintane (2021)
Subject(s)
Management sciences, decision sciences and quantitative methods
Keyword(s)
Social network analysis, network dynamics, Relational Events Model
The Relational Event Model (REM) solves a problem for organizational researchers who have access to sequences of time stamped interactions. It enables them to estimate statistical models without collapsing the data into cross-sectional panels, which removes timing and sequence information. However, there is little guidance in the extant literature regarding issues that may affect REM’s power, precision and accuracy: How many events or actors are needed? How large should the risk set be? How should statistics be scaled? To gain insights into these issues, we conduct a series of experiments using simulated sequences of relational events under different conditions and using different sampling and scaling strategies. We also provide an empirical example using email communications in a real-life context. Our results indicate that, in most cases, the power and precision levels of REMs are good, making it a strong explanatory model. However, REM suffers from issues of accuracy that can be severe in certain cases, making it a poor predictive model. We provide a set of practical recommendations to guide researcher’s use of REMs in organizational research.
With permission of SAGE Publishing
Volume
24
Journal Pages
802–829